ARMED-M
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The
Armed M is a publication of the 2nd Amendment SIG, a special interest group of
American Mensa Ltd. Opinions
expressed herein are the opinions of the writers, and not of American Mensa,
Ltd., which has no opinions. This
newsletter is linked to the Mensa web page WWW.Mensa.org as WWW.webcatt.com/2ndAmend_SIG
===============================================================================
Feb
2001
I have moved and am now in Wilmington North Carolina.
My E-Mail address is Smith13@Worldnet.att.net.
I can always use contributions to the newsletter.
If you write something or find something e-mail it to me I'll put it in
the newsletter as space and theme allows.
Bob Smith
"Necessity is the plea for
every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the
creed of slaves. - William Pitt, November 18, 1783
"He who justifies the wicked
and he who condemns the righteous, both of them are an abomination to the
Lord." - Proverbs
Kids and Guns
By Robert A. Waters - Web
Published: 12.27.00 www.sierratimes.com/archive/waters/edrw122700.htm
Give a kid a gun and he suddenly
becomes a monster, shooting up schools and blowing away anyone whom he perceives
has wronged him. Right? That’s what the mainstream media would have you think.
While such incidences do occur on rare occasions, many other times kids use guns
to save lives. But these stories don't fit the media stereotype and therefore
get no national exposure.
On Sunday afternoon, March 19,
1985, Jacqueline Roland, a mother of two, heard a noise outside her home near
Bethel, Oklahoma. As she went to investigate, she told her six-year-old son
Jimmy to get the family gun. In addition to Jimmy, four other children were in
the home at the time.
As Mrs. Roland stepped outside, a
masked man grabbed her and placed a knife to her throat. Jimmy Roland, following
his mother's instructions, walked outside with a .22-caliber rifle. Seeing the
masked man holding his mother, the youngster aimed the gun at the assailant's
head and cried, "Turn my mommy loose!"
"Put the gun down!" the
masked man snapped. Instead, Jimmy
Roland cocked it.
According to Pottawotomie County
Sheriff Paul Abel, "the man apparently thought the boy was going to shoot
him. He loosened his grip on Mrs. Roland and she broke away." The assailant
fled but was soon captured, along with two accomplices. All were lifelong
criminals and predators.
Sheriff Abel had nothing but
praise for six-year-old Jimmy Roland. "In all likelihood," the sheriff
said, "he saved every one of those people’s lives...They're just average
people who taught their child safety with guns from the time they were real
little, because there are guns in that house as there are in most of the houses
around here."
In a barrio near Compton,
California, eighteen miles south of Los Angeles, Hispanics have to fight every
day just to survive. According to an Associated Press article, on March 30,
1999, at around noon, two robbers entered the 99 Cents Plus Mini Market. The
sixty-two-year-old owner, a grandmother whose name was not released, was working
the counter along with a teenage employee. Her twelve-year-old grandson was also
in the store.
One of the robbers pointed a
"machine pistol" at the owner and demanded money from the cash drawer.
The teenage employee knocked the gun away, and began struggling with the robber.
As they were fighting, Dennis
Smith, the second robber, began beating the owner. He knocked the grandmother to
the floor and continued to punch her while she was down.
Her twelve-year-old grandson
grabbed a handgun and fired several shots, hitting Smith four times. He died a
few hours later. The other robber escaped.
The twelve-year-old was not
charged.
Juan Zamora, who owns a shop next
door, summed up the desperation of those trying to earn an honest living in the
barrio. "Always they have troubles because everybody try to steal," he
said. "The police come very late. They come after one hour, after three
hours, after four hours. Everybody is still afraid. Nobody protects us."
Adam Cummins, 38, of Wichita,
Kansas, was a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic. He could function normally at
times, and then he would snap and become violent. Because of his mental illness,
Kathryn Adams, his mother, had raised Cummins' fifteen-year-old daughter.
On May 17, 2000, at 10:00 p.m., a
visibly agitated Cummins appeared at Adams' home. Having first-hand knowledge of
his violent tendencies, she locked the front door and refused to let him inside.
Undeterred, he kicked in the door.
As the crazed man launched a
vicious assault on the terrified woman, Adams yelled for her granddaughter to
"get the gun." In the meantime, Cummins hit Adams several times with a
claw hammer, fracturing her skull.
As the assault continued, the
fifteen-year-old ran to a nightstand in her grandmothers' upstairs bedroom and
pulled out a handgun. By this time, Cummins had bludgeoned his mother into
unconsciousness.
Then he started up the stairs.
His daughter met him at the top
of the stairs. She fired one shot, striking Cummins in the abdomen, ending the
assault. He died a few minutes later. According to a story in the Wichita Eagle,
Kathryn Adams remained in critical condition with a fractured skull.
Jim McNiece, principal of
Northeast Magnet High School, where the girl attended, stated that the school
had provided counseling for the traumatized teen. "She has a lot of support
from family and friends at school," he said.” She’s a nice kid, and is
worried about her grandmother. That's where all the attention of the family is
focused."
Police said that over a long
period, Cummins had had many dealings with law enforcement officials and mental
health agencies. He had threatened police officers, mental health workers, and
his ex-wife (the mother of the fifteen-year-old). For years he had fought with
his wife and mother for custody of the girl. The family had tried numerous times
to have him institutionalized. On the day he died, he'd called his ex-wife and
threatened to kill her.
Police credited the
fifteen-year-old girl with using appropriate force to stop a vicious assault.
Kids and guns.January 17, 2001
More Proof that Gun Control Works! NOT
Professor Joseph E. Olson of the
Hamline University School of Law in St.Paul, Minn. has produced a very telling
statistical analysis of the murder rates in all the counties of the US.
He compared the murder rates in the counties that went for Bush in the
last election to the rate in the counties that went for Gore.
Here is what he found:
Average Murder Rate in counties
won by Bush: 8.5per 100,000
population.
Average Murder Rate in counties
won by Gore: 13.2per 100,000
population.
Lesson:
The counties that voted for Gore are crime ridden.
They are typically also liberal, vote Democratic, and have the harshest
gun control laws. Yet their attempts to control crime by
"controlling" guns has failed miserably.
As long as they continue to support such failed gun control laws--and the
politicians that push them—it seems they get what they deserve.
Can We Relax Now?
There is no doubt that Al
Gore’s loss in the Presidential election stopped lot of bad things from
happening to gun owners, but there are so many bad trends ongoing already that
all freedom loving Americans should not relax their vigilance. These trends slowed some due to Gore’s loss, but they
continue to progress even now. As
we speak, special federal "gun prosecutors" are being hired and
installed all across the nation to do nothing but one thing:
Prosecute violations of federal gun laws. This new program is Clinton’s reaction to the NRA’s
successful media campaign to convince the public that more gun laws are not
needed, but enforcement of the laws we already have is enough.
Since federal gun laws are vast
and complicated, and often vague and generally unknown to the average person,
there are going to be lots of people who are going to suffer in the coming
months. It should scare every gun
owner that there are now prosecutors with nothing to do but look for ways to
prosecute them. And the more these
prosecutors succeed at their task of suppressing real gun crime, the fewer real
criminals will they have to occupy their time.
They will then turn their attention to more and more minor and technical
violations of the gun laws to fill out their caseloads. Don’t expect these
prosecutors to believe any law they are asked to enforce is unconstitutional
Our tradition of armed citizens
is being attacked at the UN too. The
United Nations is drafting and attempting to implement new international
treaties against your right to own "light arms." Gun Owners are being prosecuted for murder for merely selling
a gun that (years) later ends up being used in a murder
The next generation is being
taught gun phobia by your public schools. All
across the nation government-run schools are reacting hysterically to students
who draw pictures of guns, or merely write stories involving them,(one case saw
a boy suspended for bringing a GI Joe doll’s toy gun to school).
The Brady Law is effectively denying many citizens of their right to buy
firearms, because of bureaucratic snafus. In
Austin, Texas, citizens are having their guns unlawfully seized by local police
and forced to jump through administrative hoops to get them back.
Reports from California reveal that police agencies are checking firearms
records on people they pull over in traffic stops.
We have seen the election of two
of the most rabid gun haters to the US Senate:
Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer, (both from New York).
Even high profile Republicans are jumping on the bandwagon for more,
useless gun controls. For example,
presidential contender John McCain appeared on TV ads in Colorado to help pass a
ban on private transfers of guns at or near gun shows (it passed, as did one in
Oregon). And in the new Congress,
Republican Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island has announced he willed-introduce
retiring Sen. Frank Lautenberg’s (D-NJ) federal anti-gunshowbill.
Thanks Jack, for picking up where a Democrat left off.
Just this month the IRS issued
regulations trying to squelch the voice of pro-gun websites by threatening to
reject their tax-exempt status if they try to influence voters by showing the
voting records of politicians, or send emails with political information to
non-members. See it for yourself on
pages 385-387 of the IRS bulletin,
(http://ftp.fedworld.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb00-42.pdf ).
We won’t even mention the sad
case of poor Russ Howard, ex NRA board member, who was hit with an $808,000 for
his personal foray into California politics to take out an anti-gun state
Senator. He is just another example
of the minefield the ordinary citizen faces if he actually tries to "get
involved" in what is supposed to be a free and open political
process.Ex-State Senator Jerry Patterson has himself recently paid a high price
for his 2nd Amendment activism. The
lobby organization for HMO’s in Texas, Texas Assoc. of Health Plans (TAHP),
recently gave him the choice of stopping all such activities, or losing his job
as their lobbyist, he chose to give up the job.
There is plenty more bad news
that won’t fit on this page. So
if you think you don’t need to be involved, we hope we have changed your mind.
The fight for your gun rights needs you.
The Bush Record on Guns The
Washington Times, 10/10/2000 John Lott, Jr.
Concealed Handgun Laws
Guns in Churches
Trigger Locks
Suits Against Gun Makers
Guns continue to be a central
issue in the presidential campaign. For a year now, Vice President Al Gore has
painted Texas Gov. George W. Bush as an extremist, a pawn of the National Rifle
Association who recklessly endangered people by signing a concealed handgun law.
Mr. Gore has gone as far as linking Mr. Bush's signing of the Texas concealed
handgun law to last year’s fatal shooting at a Fort Worth church. Handgun
Control has just launched an advertising campaign featuring actor Martin Sheen
making similar claims.
Mr. Gore's and Handgun Control's
typecasting is made easier by the stereotypical view held of Texas. But what few
realize is that with about 42,000 words' worth of state gun laws, Texas law is
actually quite average. Those accusing Mr. Bush of flip-flops to position
himself as a moderate are, to put it charitably, unfamiliar with his record.
Concealed handgun laws: Texas'
concealed handgun laws have a lot of company. Thirty other states have similar
so-called "shall issue" laws, which set up objective rules allowing
people permits once they pass certain criteria: a criminal background check, a
minimum age, payment of required fees, and any necessary training. Another 12
states have more restrictive "discretionary" rules, where local
officials can use their discretion to determine whether an applicant has
demonstrated sufficient need for protection. Only seven states totally forbid
the carrying of concealed handguns.
Yet, even this does not give the
complete picture because Texas has one of the most restrictive shall-issue laws,
with the third longest training requirement at 10 hours. (Half the other states
require no training whatsoever and another quarter requires three to five
hours.) Texas also has the highest fees at $140, compared to the average of $60.
Background checks in Texas are also relatively stringent.
Mr. Bush makes no apologies for
signing the law that went into effect in January 1996, and says, "I believe
the law we passed in Texas has made Texas a safer place." Indeed murder
rates in Texas fell by 25 percent between 1995 and 1997, much faster than the 16
percent decline in states without shall issue laws. The rape rate in Texas fell
twice as fast.
Guns in churches.
The most emotional attack against
Mr. Bush is that he signed a 1997 law allowing people to carry concealed
handguns in churches. But this charge is completely misleading. Churches are
still listed as an area where permit holders are forbidden to carry their
weapons. What the 1997 law did was create a uniform warning sign requirement for
permit holders across all public buildings, including churches. The change was
strongly supported by ministers in the state.
After the concealed handgun law
took effect in 1996, owners of public buildings had the right to post a sign
stating that concealed handguns were not allowed on their property. Churches
were initially exempt from this warning requirement because concealed handguns
were never permitted in churches. But since it is not always obvious which
buildings is church property, in order to avoid confusion, the 1997 law
explicitly made the rule the same across all public buildings. The law was also
motivated by issues of fairness and ease of prosecution, since many thought that
permit holder sought to be warned before entering a building where guns were
prohibited.
Trigger locks.
Some media pundits expressed
surprise when Mr. Bush said that, if passed, he would sign a law mandating that
trigger locks be sold with guns. Leaving aside whether such legislation is wise,
this is in line with what he did as governor. He signed legislation in 1995 that
made it a crime to store firearms in a way that a reasonable person would know
that someone under 18could gain access to a weapon. Indeed, while 17 states have
similar laws, Texas is one of only four states that sets the age limit for
access as high as 18. The other states set it between 12 and 16.
Suits against gun makers.
Mr. Bush made liability reform a
cornerstone of his governorship, and has signed into law major tort reform early
during his first term as governor. He has long been unwilling to
"subcontract out public policy to the trial lawyers," and the legal
assault on the gun is no different. His decision to support this legislation,
which restricts city suits against gun makers, was courageous, because after the
Columbine attack politicians in many other states, fearing public reaction,
delayed or quietly buried reform legislation. But Mr. Bush held firm, and signed
legislation only weeks after Columbine.
While Mr. Bush has supported
legislation backed by the NRA such as concealed handguns and restraining suits
against gun makers, he has opposed them on trigger locks and background checks
at gun shows. His consistency stands in sharp contrast to the changes in Mr.
Gore's positions on guns and abortion when he first tried to make the move from
Tennessee to the Democratic presidential primaries in 1988. Mr. Bush is not the
trigger-happy cowboy Mr. Gore and Handgun Control are portraying him to be.
John Lott is a senior research
scholar at the Yale University Law School. The second edition of his book,
"More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws"
(University of Chicago, 2000) was published in June.
Father Murphy and the Million-Mom
March By David Diet man http://www.lewrockwell.com/dieteman/dieteman19.html
There is an Irish folk song named
"Boulavogue," which tells the story of a Catholic priest, Father John
Murphy.
Ultimately, the story of
Boulavogue is the story of a priest who convinced His flock to surrender their
arms to their government, but upon seeing the slaughter of his flock by that
government, came to lead his sheep in rebellion, and was executed in the end.
At first, as the United Irish
(founded by Wolfe Tone, a Protestant) struggled to start the Rebellion of 1798,
Father Murphy convinced his parishioners to sign an oath of allegiance to the
government. The county of Wexford, as Robert Kee writes in the first volume of
The Green Flag, was "feebly organized" for rebellion.
The plan of the United Irish was
for all of Ireland to rise against the English simultaneously. This was only
four years after the revolution in Poland led by Tadeusz Kosciuscko (a veteran
of the American Revolution), nine years after the French Revolution, and 22
years after the beginning of the American Revolution.
The spark which set Wexford on
fire (quite literally) was the search for illegal weapons (sound familiar?). The
English used the local yeomanry to scour the county for weapons and,
predictably, the local volunteers were a bit too enthusiastic in their searches
and seizures.
The North Cork militia, which searched Wexford for illegal arms, was
mostly Catholic. Despite this fact, they were no easier on the mostly Catholic
locals than the Protestant militias were in other parts of Catholic
Ireland. As Kee observes, the
North Cork militia "were the very troops popularly credited with the
invention of the pitch-cap method of torture. One of their sergeants named
Heppenstal had acquired the nickname of 'the walking gallows ' for his peculiar
skill in half-hanging men over his shoulder."
By May of 1798, men and women in
Wexford slept in the fields so as not to die in their houses, should their
houses be put to the torch in the middle of the night. News of massacres and
uprisings from all over Ireland had tensions running high.
In this atmosphere, Father John Murphy encouraged his parishioners to
surrender their arms in exchange for the promise of protection by the English
government.
His parishioners did so.
Unsurprisingly, the English did not abide by the rules of their alleged
protections. As Kee reports,
"The Arms Proclamation in Wexford had allowed a period of fourteen days for
the surrender of arms. But the local magistrates and troops had shown no
inclination to wait that long but had begun floggings and other tortures
immediately."
Troops who encountered peasants,
after demanding the surrender of arms, simply opened fire without waiting for
compliance. This disregard for the
rule of law outraged the Irish, as it had outraged the American colonists
twenty-two years earlier: "A portion of the men...had now become
spiritless. They saw that a Proclamation issued with all the formality and
apparent binding of an Act of Parliament was despised and made no account
of...Their arms in a great measure surrendered, they became silent, sullen and
resolved to meet their fate with such arms as they were in possession of."
In other words, after the Irish
had dutifully turned over their weapons, they quickly realized that they were
sheep for the slaughter. Having voluntarily deprived themselves of their most
effective means of self-defense, they now stood at the mercy of their English
oppressors.
The English set fire to one farm
after shooting into a crowd of men working the fields. The lieutenant in charge
of the torching, a man named Bookey, is remembered to this day in the song
Boulavogue. Bookey died that day, stabbed in the throat by a pike.
The next day, Bookey's regiment
rampaged across the countryside in a feat of vengeance that would have pleased
Abe Lincoln and General Sherman. Over 170 homes were burned, as well as Father
Murphy's chapel at Boulavogue.
As a result of this destruction, Father Murphy and roughly 1,000 men
gathered on Oulart Hill, with perhaps fifty guns and no military leadership.
The group was attacked by 110 members of the North Cork militia, but
drove the militia from the hill.
After
an encouraging string of early victories, the rebels were soundly defeated.
Massacres of Protestants alienated the few Protestants, such as Beauchamp
Bagenal Harvey, who had provided a semblance of military leadership. At Vinegar
Hill, cannon fire and determined assaults drove the rebels from their base while
"mowing them down like grass."
The
English, who would come to fight the Germans in two world wars in the twentieth
century, relied not only upon local militias, but upon imported German
mercenaries - Hessians, as in the American Revolution - to put down the
rebellion. The Hessians were ruthless in their depredations.
As
Kee reports, one English officer later wrote that the crown's forces never gave
quarter in the rebellion...hundreds and thousands of wretches were butchered
while unarmed on their knees begging mercy; and it is difficult to say whether
[regular] soldiers, yeomen or militia men took most delight in their bloody
work. In such actions as he saw, all the male inhabitants of any house in which
the rebels took refuge were put to death and the German contingent in the king's
army, Hessians commanded by a Count Hompech, won fame for their rape and
slaughter of women. The same officer reckons that altogether 25,000 rebels and
peaceable inhabitants were killed in this way, 'by the lowest calculation,' and
the Protestant historian, Gordon, in trying to assess the total number of people
killed on both sides in the whole rebellion and reaching the tentative figure of
50,000, says he 'has reason to think that more men than fell in battle were
killed in cold blood.'
The
Rising of 1798 at an inglorious end, the English hung Father John Murphy, burned
his body in a barrel of tar, and placed his head on a spike on a main street.
Of
course, there was tragedy in the deaths of those loyal to the English occupiers
as well. Among those killed fighting for English domination of Ireland was Lord
Mountjoy, "who, as Luke Gardiner twenty years before, had carried through
the Irish House of Commons the first Catholic Relief Bill, permitting Catholics
once again to own land."
After
the rebellion of 1798, the Irish would wait 150 years to gain their
independence. Many more would die during those 150 years, either in war,
rebellion, or An Gorta Mor (the Famine).
Only after the Easter Rebellion of 1916, a civil war in the 1920s, and
the willingness of Eamon DeValera to declare Irish independence in 1948, did
Ireland regain the independence it had lost nearly 700 years earlier.
The
story of Father Murphy has rather obvious implications for America today.
Rather than blindly surrender our freedoms and firearms in exchange for
paper promises of "protection," Americans are better served to rely
upon themselves.
There
are an abundance of fools today - Rosie O'Donnell, Pulitzer Prize winning
cartoonist Don Wright of the Palm Beach Post, the Million Mom March, and most
Democratic politicians - who would have Americans willingly surrender their
firearms. The argument is that if only regular citizens would give up the means
of self-defense, enjoyment, and hunting, then there would be no crime, no
murder.
How utterly stupid.
Crime
is caused by criminals - persons with evil hearts and evil intentions. Although
it is fashionable today to "understand" why a criminal turned to a
life of crime, this should not excuse what the criminal does, nor should it
cause one to leave one's doors unlocked at night, or to leave oneself unarmed
within a home. The murdered man or woman, or the rape victim, is not made whole
again because we realize that a felon did what he did after having been abused
as a child, or because of a chemical imbalance in his brain.
To leave oneself defenseless, at the mercy of criminals and dependent
upon someone answering a call of 911, is sheer foolishness.
In
the event that an NFL-linebacker sized man (or, the way the NFL is going these
days, an NFL linebacker) breaks into your home with the intent of raping,
killing, and robbing, do you really wish to rely on your luck to a) get to the
phone, b) dial it, c) wait for them to pick up, d) describe to the person on the
phone how you are about to die, and then e) wait for the police to arrive?
Your loved ones may get the joy of hearing your screams played over and
over on the nightly news while a transcription of "Oh my God! Please
stop!" runs across the screen. (The media is so sensitive, especially where
the feelings of victims are concerned).
Far
better to have the means of your own protection quick at hand. As the old saying
goes "God created men, but Sam Colt made them equal." For the very
slow, Sam Colt invented the Colt revolver. It's a gun.
What
does this have to do with Father Murphy, aside from the obvious connection to
surrendering guns? Aside from Rosie
and the gang of twits mentioned above, the churches have gotten into the
gun-banning game. How many people
have to die, how many girls must be raped, before the churches snap out of their
latest fad?
The
church teaches that one has a moral duty of self-defense. Just as suicide -
actively causing harm to oneself - is immoral, so too is the failure to resist
when resistance is possible (passively allowing harm to be done to yourself). If
you are in mortal danger, respect for yourself requires you to fight back.
Exactly
how are faithful Christians supposed to fulfill their duty of self-defense
without the means to do so? How are they to protect their children without the
means to do so? If there is a better means of defending one's self than a gun,
please tell me and I will buy it in large quantities.
If
you are a 100-pound woman facing a 250 pound, 6'2" man - roughly, an NFL
linebacker - would you rather have a) a baseball bat, b) a kitchen knife, or c)
a pistol or shotgun? Hopefully, the
answer is c every time. If guns are no good for self-defense, one wonders why
muscular male police officers feel the need to carry them. Surely, in
hand-to-hand combat with knives, clubs, or fists, a tough cop might stand a
chance where a housewife stands none.
Americans,
learn a lesson from Father Murphy. Don't trust your government to protect you,
and don't hand over your most effective means of self-defense.
For
those of you still foolish enough to listen to anything said by Rosie O'
Donnell, or any Democratic politician, such that you might be worried that your
kids will find your guns and injure themselves, take a look at the cold, hard
facts: guns save lives, and they save the lives of children.
John
Lott's book More Guns, Less Crime and Robert Waters' The Best Defense: True
Stories of Intended Victims who Defended Themselves with a Firearm provide all
the data to satisfy the most die-hard ammophobes (gun-o-phobes just doesn't have
a ring to it). Your toddler is more likely to drown in a bathtub than be shot.
Those statistics you hear so often on the nightly news about kids being
shot include 17, 18 and 19 year old murder victims, i.e. persons involved in
gangs and drugs.
If
you want to truly teach your children to understand the importance of gun
safety, buy a gun, learn to use it safely, and teach your children as well. The
NRA's Eddie the Eagle program is a model of gun safety - endorsed by the FBI, no
less.