ARMED-M
__________________________________________________________________________________________
The
Armed M is a publication of the 2nd Amendment SIG, a special interest group of
American Mensa Ltd. Opinions
expressed herein are the opinions of the writers, and not of American Mensa,
Ltd., which has no opinions. This
newsletter is linked to the Mensa web page WWW.Mensa.org as WWW.webcatt.com/2ndAmend_SIG
===============================================================================
Sept.2001
I have moved and am now in Wilmington North Carolina.
My E-Mail address is Smith13@att.net.
I can always use contributions to the newsletter.
If you write something or find something e-mail it to me I'll put it in
the newsletter as space and theme allows.
Bob Smith -----
September 11 is my birthday. It wasn’t a good day for me, my son was at the Pentagon when it was hit finally got word he is fine.
In prior hijackings the idea was to hold passengers and crew hostages. In a hostage situation time is on the side of the good guys so not resisting is a good idea. Time has changes and it is time to reconsidering resisting. I think arming crews makes sense but more effective would be the crews deadheading in civilian cloths. Allowing law enforcement officers and concealed carry personal to be armed on aircraft makes sense. Need safety bullets to try to save pressurization.
I was on the selection team for Air Force One. A long range B747B carries 480,000# of fuel, that’s five times the amount on the larger aircraft used Tuesday.
In the 60’s Civil Defense trained a group of us engineers and architects to analyze fall out shelters and to design blast resistant structures. The top of the trade towers collapsing I can understand but the remainder of the building should have continued to stand. We need to change our designs to take the impact load of the floors above collapsing
Bob
_______________________________________________________________________________________.
The numbers coming out of what happened in New York and Washington last
Tuesday are almost too big to comprehend: Thousands believed dead. Millions of
pounds of rubble where the World Trade Center and part of the Pentagon stood.
Billions of dollars expected to be sent to New York as aid.
That’s why Heritage Foundation analysts are
trying to give these numbers some context. Below is a quick reference guide from
Heritage’s Center for Data Analysis (CDA) that includes figures and facts
about:
Number of Air Hijacking Incidents
|
Year |
U.S. registered Aircraft |
Foreign-registered Aircraft |
|
1995 |
6a |
13a |
|
1976 |
2 |
14 |
|
1977 |
5 |
26 |
|
1978 |
7 |
17 |
|
1979 |
11 |
13 |
|
1980 |
21 |
18 |
|
1981 |
7 |
23 |
|
1982 |
9 |
22 |
|
1983 |
17 |
15 |
|
1984 |
5 |
21 |
|
1985 |
4 |
22 |
|
1986 |
2 |
5 |
|
1987 |
3 |
5 |
|
1988 |
1 |
10 |
|
1989 |
1 |
14 |
|
1990 |
1 |
39 |
|
1991 |
1 |
23 |
|
1992 |
0 |
12 |
|
1993 |
0 |
31 |
|
1994 |
0 |
23 |
|
1995 |
0 |
9 |
|
1996 |
0 |
14 |
|
1997 |
0 |
10 |
|
1998 |
0 |
9 |
|
1999 |
0 |
11 |
|
2000 |
0 |
20 |
Note: This does not include
commandeering or bombings of airplanes. The difference between commandeering and
hijacking is that a hijacking is defined as a case where a passenger takes over
a plane or attempts to take over a plane after the doors are closed (even
if the plane is still on the ground).
Number
of International Terrorist Attacks
From 1981 to 2000, there were a total of 9,179 international terrorists
attacks (excluding intra-Palestinian violence), averaging at 459 attacks a
year.
The number of terrorism attacks was at its highest in mid-1980s. The
average number of annual attacks between 1985 and 1988 numbered about 630.
Terrorism declined in the mid-1990s and was at its lowest in 1998, when
only 274 attacks were recorded. It increased in 1999 to 392 attacks, and 423
attacks in 2000.
Facilities
Struck By Terrorist Attacks, 1995-2000
Businesses are the target of choice of international terrorists. From
1995 to 2000, an average of 67 percent of international terrorists targeted
businesses. Thats compared to only 7 percent aimed at diplomats and 3.5
percent at government facilities.
A total of 1,842 businesses were attacked abroad by international terrorists
compared to 200 diplomatic posts and 97 government facilities.
Only 48 military facilities, or less than 2 percent of the total number of
attacks, were hit by international terrorists.
Of the roughly 2,850 attacks launched, 571 were aimed at other establishments.
American Casualties
Caused by Attacks, 1995-2000
From 1995
to 2000, 77 Americans died as a result of international terrorist attacks.
That’s an average of 13 per year.
During the
same period, 651 Americans were wounded by international terrorists, or an
average of 109 per year.
Total Terrorist Attacks By Region, 1995-2000
From 1995 to
2000, Latin America experienced the most international terrorist attacks with
729. That’s an average of 122 attacks per year. The year 2000 saw the most
attacks in Latin America, when 193 were recorded.
Western
Europe is second with 608 attacks, an average of 101 per year. The overall
number of terrorist attacks there, however, has been decreasing from a high of
272 in 1995 to a low of 30 in 2000.
Asia has
been seeing a rise in terrorist attacks, from 16 in 1995 to a high of 98 in
2000, for a total of 267 for the 6-year period.
North
America has had the lowest concentration of international terrorist attacks.
Only 15 were recorded from 1995 to 2000.
Total Terrorist Deaths from Attacks by Region,
1995-2000
Asia suffered
the most deaths as a result of terrorist attacks; a total of 9,713 perished
there from 1995 to 2000. Africa follows with 5,762 deaths for the 6-year
period. The Middle East comes next with 2,190, and Western Europe with 1,212.
North America had the least number of dead, with only seven during that
period.
Asia has
the highest number of deaths in a single year for any region, with 5,639 dead
in 1995. This is followed by Africa with 5,379 deaths in 1998.
Total
Anti-U.S. Attacks in 2000
In 2000, 86
percent of anti-U.S. attacks occurred in Latin America. The rest of the
anti-U.S. attacks came in Asia (4.5 percent), Western Europe (3.5 percent),
Africa (3 percent), Eurasia (2 percent) and the Middle East (1 percent).
This includes attacks against U.S. facilities and attacks in which American
citizens suffered casualties.
A majority
of the attacks were in the form of bombings (90 percent). Other methods used
were: kidnapping (6 percent), armed attack (2 percent), arson (1 percent),
firebombing (1 percent), and other methods (2 percent).
Businesses
were the common target for nearly 87 percent of these attacks. Only about 3
percent of the attacks were directed at military establishments and
facilities. Diplomatic establishments were next (1.5 percent) followed by
government facilities that were neither military nor diplomatic. (less than 1
percent).
U.S.-based
airplanes from commuter planes to jumbo jetstook off more than 8.8 million
times last year, or 241,000 flights per day.
More than
80 air carriers, including freight, commuter, charter and major commercial
transporters, departed from 565 regional and major American airports every
day.
Major
domestic passenger airline statistics:
American:
743,000+ departures
Continental:
397,000+ departures
Delta:
900,000+ departures
Northwest:
563,000+ departures
TWA:
274,000+ departures
United:
750,000+ departures
U.S.
Airways 736,000+ departures
Airplane Accidents in the United States
There were 47
accidents involving airplanes last year, or less than one per week.
Only 21 of
them were considered serious accidents, producing some kind of injury.
Only three
led to a loss of life.
Most of the
serious accidents occurred when individuals (usually flight attendants) were
hurt due to moderate or severe air turbulence.
Arrests
at U.S. Airports From Airline Passenger Screening, 1980-1998
|
|
|
Persons Arrested |
|
|
Year |
Passengers Screened (Millions) |
Carrying firearms/ explosives |
Giving False Info |
|
1980 |
585 |
1,031 |
32 |
|
1981 |
599 |
1,187 |
49 |
|
1982 |
630 |
1,314 |
27 |
|
1983 |
709 |
1,282 |
34 |
|
1984 |
776 |
1,285 |
27 |
|
1985 |
993 |
1,310 |
42 |
|
1986 |
1,055 |
1,415 |
89 |
|
1987 |
1,096 |
1,581 |
81 |
|
1988 |
1,055 |
1,493 |
222 |
|
1989 |
1,113 |
1,436 |
83 |
|
1990 |
1,145 |
1,336 |
18 |
|
1991 |
1,015 |
893 |
28 |
|
1992 |
1,111 |
1,282 |
13 |
|
1993 |
1,150 |
1,354 |
31 |
|
1994 |
1,261 |
1,433 |
35 |
|
1995 |
1,263 |
1,194 |
68 |
|
1996 |
1,497 |
999 |
131 |
|
1997 |
1,660 |
924 |
72 |
|
1998 |
1,903 |
660 |
86 |
Use
of Airplanes for Long Trips (100+ miles), 1995 (most recent date available)
There were 1 billion person-trips* over 100 miles taken in 1995
Almost
16 percent of those were on airplanes.
Of those
airplane flights, about 43 percent were for business purposes.
Those who
are 65+ years old took only 8.3 percent of all airplane flights.
The
majority of air passengers (65 percent) have household incomes greater than
$50,000.
* A
person-trip is one person traveling to a destination. For example, if a
family of three flies from Albuquerque to San Jose, that is considered three
person-trips.
Deaths
from U.S. Wars and Battles
American Revolution (April 19, 1775-Oct. 18, 1781): 4,435
Antietam (Sept. 16-18, 1862): 3,654
Pearl Harbor (Dec. 6, 1941): 2,388
D-Day (June 6, 1944): 4,900
Iwo Jima (Feb. 19-March 25, 1945): 6,503
Tet Offensive (Jan. 27-June 1,
1968): 7,040
All Facts & Figures compiled by The
Heritage Foundation
Published
Tuesday, May 8, 2001, in the Contra Costa Newspapers High court throws out
'conscience' By Matt Sebastian
TIMES
STAFF WRITER
California
jurors must follow the law, and not their consciences, when deliberating, the
state Supreme Court ruled Monday, dismissing the historic doctrine of jury
nullification as "contrary to our ideal of equal justice for all."
The
justices unanimously upheld a Santa Clara County judge's decision to remove a
juror who refused, on principle, to consider convicting an 18-year-old defendant
of statutory.
The
ruling, the court's first on nullification, is a blow to proponents of the
unwritten, but time-tested, principle that jurors are the "conscience of
the community" and should reject unjust laws by refusing to convict.
"Judges
have systematically refused to grapple with what nullification really
means," said Alan Scheflin, a Santa Clara University law professor.
"They've erected this bogeyman that they take great delight in
destroying." Nullification
"may sound lofty," Chief Justice Ronald M. George wrote, "but
such unchecked and unreviewable power can lead to verdicts based on bigotry and
whim."
The
court, in its 28-page opinion, also warned that nullification would leave the
fate of defendants to the "whims of a particular jury" which could
disregard the presumption of innocence or even convict "by the flip of a
coin."
Jury
nullification dates back hundreds of years, but rose to prominence during the
Revolutionary War period. Juries have since used the principle to acquit those
who helped free slaves during the 1800s, as well as bootleggers prosecuted
during Prohibition.
"There's
no constitutional basis for jury nullification, yet it does exist," said
Rita Simon, a law professor at American University. "De Toqueville even
mentioned it when he praised the American jury system."
Monday's
opinion stems from the 1995 conviction of Arasheik W. Williams by a Santa Clara
jury on charges of, false imprisonment, and assault and statutory.
During
closing arguments, Williams' attorney told the jurors "a jury may, at
times, afford a higher justice by refusing to enforce harsh laws."
Hours
into deliberation, the jury foreman reported to the judge that juror James Kelly
refused to discuss the statutory charge because "he believes the law is
wrong."
Kelly
told Judge Paul Teilh he couldn't consider the charge: "I simply cannot see
staining a man, a young man, for the rest of his life for what I believe to be
the wrong reason."
Under
the American legal system, juries need not explain how they arrived at their
verdicts. But judges can, and do,
remove jurors who make it known they will practice nullification.
In
the Williams case, the judge removed Kelly from the jury, saying he had violated
his oath of service that required the juror to follow the judge's instructions.
The
jury, with an alternate in place, voted the next day to convict Williams, who
was later, sentenced to six years in prison.
"This ruling will only encourage jurors to lie," Scheflin said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.guntruths.com/Resource/facts_you_can_use.htm
It
has recent stats for Homicides, Suicides, and accidental deaths for the US and
many other countries. You should be able to pull together enough information
from this. Just in case you thought
our KGB would never destroy someone's life for only the shallowest of motives .
. .
When
I was a small boy the FBI killed one of my father's best friends for having
loaned a few dollars to his kid brother, after the brother had robbed a
government office. My father's
friend had no knowledge of the crime, but was harassed (without charges) until
he had a nervous breakdown. It took
three electro-shock treatments in a government mental hospital to kill him.
And then in school we were taught to tsk-tsk-tsk because the Soviets did
that to dissidents.
But
maybe all in my entire dad's friend was luckier than the guy in the following
story. Remember that the last words
of Orwell's "1984" are, "And he loved Big Brother."
Read
on. --Andy
Still
trust the bastards in our government? Not
on your life!!! Joe.
Man
Imprisoned 30 Years for Crime FBI Knew He Didn't Commit Friday, May 04, 2001
By
David Shuster and Sharon Kehnemui
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,21095,00.html
WASHINGTON
- Representatives on the House Government Reform Committee showed a rare display
of emotion on Thursday, as they heard the story of a man who spent 30 years in
prison for a crime the FBI knew he did not commit.
"Your
story of faith, your story of family, your story of courage and perseverance is
a gift to your nation. And we cherish it," Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn.,
tearfully told Joe Salvati, a Massachusetts husband and father of four.
"Your testimony will insure no one else has to endure the outrageous
indignities and injustices you, Mr. Salvati, and your family, Marie, and your
family, have suffered."
Salvati
was 34 when he was sent to prison in 1967 for a 1965 Boston murder.
He had apparently owed money to an informant who told officials Salvati
committed the murder, in an attempt to cover up the real killer's identity.
It took 26 years for Salvati's lawyer, Victor Garo, to uncover documents
proving FBI agents and Boston police decided to prosecute Salvati to protect the
identities of a few informants they believed would be endangered if the real
murderer were identified. Several
of those informants later committed other murders. Documents also showed
then-FBI director J. Edgar Hoover knew of the misconduct and false testimony but
let the case go on Salvati, who was exonerated earlier this year - four years
after his sentence was commuted - broke down Thursday while testifying about his
experience, and the undying strength and love he gained from his wife over the
years.
He
also said that despite his 30-year imprisonment, he still had faith in the
American justice system.
"I
still consider our justice system to be the greatest justice system in -- Gag!
the world. But sometimes it fails, as in my case," he said.
"We need agencies like the FBI because there are many out in the
world that want to ----- Puke . . .hurt us.
However, when the FBI or any other similar agencies break the law, they
must be held accountable for their crimes."
Garo
was less forgiving. "It was
more important to the FBI that they protected their prized informants than it
was for innocent people not to be framed. The truth is damned. It didn't matter
the truth," he told the panel. Through
tears, Marie Salvati told of how she raised their four children without her
husband at home, but always with him in their heart.
"From
the very beginning of imprisonment, I knew that it would be important for the
children to have constant contact, with their family, with their father. And
every weekend I dress up, pack a little lunch, and go off to see him for their
hugs and their kisses and whatever went on. And he would give them their
father's guidance, even though he wasn't home with them,” Marie Salvati said.
Later
in the hearing, retired Boston FBI agent H. Paul Rico defiantly denied he helped
frame Salvati, but at the same time admitted the wrong man went to jail for the
crime.
"What
do you want, tears?" Rico shot back at Shays, who accused the agent of
feeling no remorse for his role in case. "It'll be probably a nice movie or
something," replied the ex-agent, when pressed on the matter.
Also
testifying at the hearing was lawyer F. Lee Bailey, who represented Boston
mobster Joseph "The Animal" Barboza, the first Boston mobster to enter
the witness protection program. Barboza
falsely implicated Salvati, who back in 1967 owed Barboza $400.
Bailey
later filed a sworn affidavit that his client had testified falsely.
That testimony helped to get Salvati's sentence commuted.
The
FBI's Boston office still has admitted no wrongdoing in this case and Meanwhile,
has issued no apology to the Salvati family.
But outgoing FBI director the sap they Louis Freeh issued a written
statement on Thursday promising the bureau’s framed licks their cooperation in
a criminal investigation of the agents who were involved.
asses. . .
Lawmakers
are insisting on a complete investigation, as well as an apology tsk-tsk-tsk and
compensation for the Salvatis. and increase their funding . . .
Liberty's
Educational Advocacy Forum http://freedomlaw.com promotes "action that
raises the cost of State violence for its perpetrators lay(ing) the basis for
institutional change." [Noam Chomsky]
Dr.
Tavel's Self Help Clinic and Sovereign Law Library http://drtavel.com/ Not a
high-tech law firm brochure, "because a lawyer is only as smart as you make
him" [Max Katz] and "the Law should be accessible to every man and at
all times." [Franz Kafka]
Social
Workers Not Bound by Fourth Amendment? North Carolina Case Headed for Appeal
By
Allie Martin May 18, 2001
(AgapePress)
- The North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled against a home-school family who
said social workers are bound by the U.S. Constitution.
The
case began in September 1999, when home-schooling parents Jim and Mary Ann
Stumbo of Kings Mountain, North Carolina, were visited by a worker from child
protective services. The agency had
been called by a neighbor who saw the Stumbo's two-year-old daughter run out of
her family's home without any clothes on while chasing the family cat.
The
Stumbos refused to allow the investigator inside their home, and they were taken
to court. In its ruling, the appeals court said the Stumbo's should have let the
social worker into their home to interview their children.
But
Scott Sommerville, an attorney with the Home School Legal Defense Association,
says the ruling is headed for appeal.
"Normally
when you're going to search someone's home or invade their private family life,
you need to have some evidence that they've broken the law in some way,"
Sommerville says. "In this case, all the evidence we've got is that a
two-year-old chased her kitten out the front door when she wasn't wearing her
pajamas. That really does not give you evidence that would suggest that the
law's been broken in any way -- and that's why this constitutional issue is so
important."
The
attorney says the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unwarranted searches.
"Every
year, there are approximately three million child-abuse investigations ...
two-thirds of those are unfounded," he says. "Now this case says that
those three million investigations are not searches -- and that therefore those
two million innocent families whose homes and lives were invaded [have] nothing
to complain about because they were never searched in any way, and the
Constitution doesn't apply and the social workers really aren't subject to any
kind of rules at all."
The
case now heads to the State Supreme Court. Sommerville says the case could wind
up at the U.S. Supreme Court.